teenitup

Champion Author
Houston
Posts:1,646 Points:249,935 Joined:Sep 2012
|
Message Posted: Oct 23, 2012 6:38:25 AM
The newer technology for tar sands production is much less "dangerous".
|
jrs4125

Champion Author
Indiana
Posts:2,758 Points:591,745 Joined:Sep 2011
|
Message Posted: Oct 23, 2012 1:14:12 AM
Better safe than sorry.
|
teenitup

Champion Author
Houston
Posts:1,646 Points:249,935 Joined:Sep 2012
|
Message Posted: Oct 22, 2012 6:06:11 AM
Thankfully, it has now been restarted.
|
NOTSOGRN

Champion Author
Michigan
Posts:2,056 Points:1,511,265 Joined:Dec 2007
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 11:13:25 PM
. . Don't cross a road it's dangerous...filling ones car with gas is dangerous...driving is dangerous...
|
LetemEatCake

Champion Author
Oklahoma City
Posts:5,596 Points:1,204,730 Joined:Mar 2008
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 8:25:43 PM
Absolutely agree Camel1!
Thanks for posting Teafortwo....interesting article!
|
camel1

Champion Author
Minnesota
Posts:8,270 Points:2,266,615 Joined:Jul 2006
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 8:23:19 PM
tar sands are dangerous. the product should not be mined
|
lowspeed

All-Star Author
Akron
Posts:721 Points:200,305 Joined:Aug 2008
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 8:15:37 PM
Interesting
|
downstream

Champion Author
Little Rock
Posts:1,109 Points:1,392,065 Joined:Mar 2006
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 8:14:01 PM
finally, something of substance!
|
WIWalt

Champion Author
Wisconsin
Posts:1,726 Points:415,545 Joined:Mar 2012
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 8:11:27 PM
It is no wonder our gas prices are so high when you factor in the price of these cleanups!
|
wayoung56

Champion Author
Alabama
Posts:2,800 Points:818,335 Joined:Oct 2006
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 8:10:21 PM
Interesting article...
|
shari128

All-Star Author
Iowa
Posts:573 Points:859,990 Joined:Jun 2010
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 8:10:13 PM
Let's be safe wth all the thins that we do!!
|
MG_Sputnik

Champion Author
Philadelphia
Posts:7,305 Points:1,960,405 Joined:Apr 2006
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 8:09:47 PM
Another BS reason to raise prices.
|
mrreferee

Champion Author
Savannah
Posts:1,336 Points:557,530 Joined:Jun 2011
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 8:09:44 PM
shutting down for safety issues is fine. most people would not complain
|
Math6149

All-Star Author
Jacksonville
Posts:873 Points:1,796,375 Joined:Jan 2007
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 8:07:20 PM
So?
|
Toppers

Champion Author
Atlanta
Posts:9,012 Points:2,470,695 Joined:Mar 2005
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 8:06:36 PM
Safety first
|
WIPACKERFAN

Champion Author
Chicago
Posts:8,804 Points:1,843,450 Joined:Aug 2005
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 8:06:06 PM
OK
|
s6sputnik

Champion Author
Austin
Posts:6,222 Points:1,308,130 Joined:Jun 2007
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 8:05:19 PM
Great
|
nsdp

Champion Author
San Antonio
Posts:1,117 Points:47,315 Joined:Jun 2012
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 7:42:09 PM
Yes but it would make the costs probably prohibitive. First every one needs to know Keystone XL was asking for a waiver of ASTM standards for the Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure on the line and then turning around and using pipe that didn't fully meet the safety standard to double down on the risk. This is from the Canadian National Energy Board audit of TransCanada Safety. I remember when Alyeska was built that the pipeline had to pay for independent inspectors on all materials. Everything considered it has performed pretty well. The quality of he steel was decidedly superior. It came from Japanese mills at a time when they were the best in the world. that now belongs to S Korea. The iron ore source is as important as the mill. Carbon, phosphorus and sulfur all affect steel quality. British steels for example tended to be high in sulfur and that was a key in the sinking of the Titanic. Rather than deforming as the better American and German Steels would it fractured and cause a long gash in the side which allowed water to flow in much faster. Best comparison is the fates of the battle cruisers at Jutland. German 11 inch shells penetrate British Armor and caused explosions in four out of 10 battle cruisers British fired 13.5 and 15 inch shells a the German battle cruisers and they all steamed home under their own power. The Swedish iron ore used by Krupp was a considerable part of the difference. I have yet to see any Indian or Chinese steel that matches the quality of the big 5-US, Japan France, Germany or S Korea. In the US the best steel is scrap from WWII era ships which sells at as much as $350/ton over newer scrap.
I have reservations about Keystone unless the operating pressure is lowered from the requested 1440psi to under 1000psi. That would reduce the capacity of the line by about 30-40%. I would also insist that nonaffilated inspectors control construction of the line with the authority to shut everything down if something was not right. Alyeska was built that way and the main line has proven to be much better than the field lines ARCO installed and were not supervised. The Yanbu pipeline from Ras Tanura to Yanbu in Saudia Arabia was built on the safety models of Alyeska and has no leaks since completion in 1982. It moves Saudi oil from the production areas over to the Red Sea on the west side and avoids Hormuz.
I would not approve the line without rigorous destructive testing of random samples of the pipe and valves. Too many miles between block valves means too much oil will leak in an accident. Too many open items on quality control. Too many lives and too much risk if the line ruptures. Tenneco had an accident 10 years before I started work there that killed 17 people. In 2011,UGI had a major failure and leak that destroyed 8 homes and killed 5 people and severely injured 3 others. Deferred maintenance was blamed. That is an issue that the NEB has leveled charges on after audits of TransCanada's Canadian operations. El Paso had a leak that killed 10 in 2000 and deferred maintenance was the problem. The Tenneco and El Paso lines had better quality steel than what TransCanada appears to have. Things are going to go wrong but 35 leaks in less than 3 years on the existing line is a horrible record.
[Edited by: nsdp at 10/21/2012 10:47:45 PM EST]
|
PDQBlues

Champion Author
San Diego
Posts:7,074 Points:1,448,325 Joined:Jan 2009
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 6:22:34 PM
nsdp: ...ARAMCO/Shell are having to replace all pipe in the distillation unit after a few weeks operation because of manufacturing defects. The new Sandy Creek Powerplant near Waco had pipe failures(stress cracking) on startup that will require complete replacement of piping in the superheater and reheat sections at a cost of $100mill. The Indian supplier common to these two projects is also used by Keystone. What happened to the claim that the pipe would be made in the US and Canada. Too expensive? Corner cutting? The Indian pipe has already demonstrated safety failures found by land owners not Keystone personnel of bulging and stretching both of which are precoursers to stress fractures. This is on the existing line that is less than 10 years old and already has had 35 reportable leaks. Not good maintenance not good engineering.
Thank you, nsdp, for your insider insights. Those who continually criticize those people concerned about pipeline safety either are so misinformed about these problems to live in a fantasy, or they have some financial interest in the pipeline regardless of who gets hurt (or worse, killed).
Could these oil and tar-sands pipelines be made and constructed safer? Sure, but it's not going to happen unless enforceable laws are in place to force these companies to do so.
|
nsdp

Champion Author
San Antonio
Posts:1,117 Points:47,315 Joined:Jun 2012
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 11:22:44 AM
MAC48 you might as well tell the whole truth. I am a Valero Retiree and know what the issues are. I signed pipeline safety reports for 5 years and it would have been my ass that went to jail if something was wrong. They are identical to Shell Motiva's problem in late May this year(losing 325,000 barrels a day had a lot to do with this summers higher prices):
"Motiva Enterprises LLC moved to prepare half its giant Port Arthur, Texas, refinery for an extended shut-down this week after a major glitch with a new unit, closing down other units and reducing oil shipments from Saudi Arabia.
In the first public acknowledgment of the severity of the problem at the plant, Motiva co-owner Royal Dutch Shell Plc said late on Wednesday that the stricken 325,000 barrel-per-day (bpd) unit was shut due to "corrosion problems," as originally reported earlier this week by Reuters"
That occurred within weeks of starting up a unit designed to handle Saudi Wafra crude which is very similar in properties to the dilute bitumen to be carried by Keystone. ARAMCO/Shell are having to replace all pipe in the distillation unit after a few weeks operation because of manufacturing defects. The new Sandy Creek Powerplant near Waco had pipe failures(stress cracking) on startup that will require complete replacement of piping in the superheater and reheat sections at a cost of $100mill. The Indian supplier common to these two projects is also used by Keystone. What happened to the claim that the pipe would be made in the US and Canada. Too expensive? Corner cutting? The Indian pipe has already demonstrated safety failures found by land owners not Keystone personnel of bulging and stretching both of which are precoursers to stress fractures. This is on the existing line that is less than 10 years old and already has had 35 reportable leaks. Not good maintenance not good engineering.
Who do you think you are fooling?
[Edited by: nsdp at 10/21/2012 2:26:01 PM EST]
|
Gnusman53

Champion Author
San Diego
Posts:7,003 Points:1,111,445 Joined:Feb 2004
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 11:17:43 AM
Seems Mac48 wants more regulations..... (grin).....damn liberal (bigger grin)
|
Gnusman53

Champion Author
San Diego
Posts:7,003 Points:1,111,445 Joined:Feb 2004
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 10:53:41 AM
Simple math. In just two years there has been 35 leaks/spills.
The company predicted just 5 in 50 years.
Using simple math, people living along the route can expect 840 more spills/leaks in the next 50 years (both minor and major).
People living along the Kalamazoo River needed just one to destroy their neighborhood...
It took Enbridge more than two years to even marginally clean up that mess in the Kalamazoo.....and it still destroyed the local ecostystem...
|
briinnc

Champion Author
North Carolina
Posts:2,705 Points:834,820 Joined:Jan 2010
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 10:49:18 AM
We need to start using eminent domain on Canadian land, see if they like it.
|
Ahking

Champion Author
Orange County
Posts:3,507 Points:603,450 Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 10:09:01 AM
people & environmental safety are paramount.
|
AlgaeNOW

Champion Author
Wyoming
Posts:1,012 Points:312,030 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 9:52:00 AM
k
|
Discovery02

Champion Author
Colorado Springs
Posts:2,560 Points:310,665 Joined:May 2012
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 9:21:46 AM
All the more reason government oversight is required.
|
playtimeCLE

Champion Author
Cleveland
Posts:8,555 Points:1,543,400 Joined:Nov 2008
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 8:58:40 AM
Wonders why they didn't plan the XL pipeline to run right next to this one. It would seem to solve land & routing issues.
|
Ticobird

Champion Author
Huntsville
Posts:3,231 Points:1,116,015 Joined:Oct 2009
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 8:25:53 AM
The reported info was a little lacking IMO. No conclusions were drawn.
|
eye-spy

Champion Author
Quebec
Posts:4,588 Points:2,417,845 Joined:Feb 2005
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 8:21:53 AM
"Risk" is just a part of business. Reducing risk is the key to success.
|
greatartiste

All-Star Author
New Jersey
Posts:540 Points:105,810 Joined:Apr 2011
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 8:21:07 AM
disaster...
|
TravelinMan52

Champion Author
Augusta
Posts:1,925 Points:963,645 Joined:May 2008
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 8:18:27 AM
Safety should always be the first concern...
|
Nicoalbum

Champion Author
Ottawa
Posts:6,016 Points:1,188,200 Joined:Jan 2010
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 8:06:27 AM
An ill-planned project
|
lesabreAZ

Champion Author
Phoenix
Posts:1,691 Points:412,455 Joined:Nov 2011
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 7:59:13 AM
The NPR crowd uses oil, so why complain
|
alex395

Champion Author
Louisville
Posts:2,049 Points:276,640 Joined:Jan 2007
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 7:43:49 AM
Don't know how we ever got anything done without a risk assessment. I say Lara Skinner and NPR are part of the risk.
|
teenitup

Champion Author
Houston
Posts:1,646 Points:249,935 Joined:Sep 2012
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 7:41:29 AM
MAC48 and doeslayersr, great comments.
|
Rhino8of8

Champion Author
Wisconsin
Posts:1,245 Points:374,390 Joined:Jan 2012
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 7:26:30 AM
So, now where to go read the other side of the story
|
Norm10

Champion Author
British Columbia
Posts:3,342 Points:162,925 Joined:Dec 2010
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 7:21:58 AM
So just fix it already!
|
atdinut

Champion Author
California
Posts:1,608 Points:353,985 Joined:Apr 2012
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 7:16:26 AM
Trouble.......
|
dogsdog

Veteran Author
Sacramento
Posts:314 Points:31,840 Joined:Dec 2009
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 7:09:42 AM
NPR-EPA ?????
|
ghoag

Champion Author
Twin Cities
Posts:1,128 Points:260,750 Joined:Aug 2012
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 7:04:27 AM
ok
|
bills299

Champion Author
Atlanta
Posts:3,366 Points:904,490 Joined:May 2005
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 6:54:05 AM
This could help lower prices and boost supplies!!
|
Canucktree

Champion Author
Alberta
Posts:4,896 Points:1,020,625 Joined:Dec 2008
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 6:38:49 AM
We already mix it all up in Edmonton and pipeline it down to you already, you will just be able to have 25% more. Maybe you could reopen the 25% of the refineries Bush closed 5 years ago?! Remember the oil peak, just before the crash?!
|
pscamp

Champion Author
Ottawa
Posts:3,277 Points:475,135 Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 6:36:37 AM
OK
|
Evilmaddog

Champion Author
British Columbia
Posts:3,322 Points:957,550 Joined:Aug 2010
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 6:30:44 AM
Build more refineries in Canada
|
imcheep

Champion Author
New Mexico
Posts:2,492 Points:649,830 Joined:Apr 2005
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 6:29:06 AM
Look at the source...
|
merlinCO

Champion Author
Colorado
Posts:1,640 Points:341,395 Joined:Mar 2012
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 6:27:32 AM
Have Canada build refineries!
|
Buckeyee

Champion Author
Maine
Posts:4,608 Points:899,005 Joined:May 2010
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 6:12:44 AM
Look at the source of this article, NPR= National Progressive Radio sure it isn't slanted.
|
Joeski1

Champion Author
New Jersey
Posts:10,001 Points:1,741,835 Joined:Dec 2004
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 6:00:53 AM
Look at the bright side. Right now it aint leaking any more.
|
amoshins

Champion Author
Trenton
Posts:2,195 Points:641,645 Joined:Apr 2011
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 5:55:36 AM
Vote me in
|
crmedic

Champion Author
Arkansas
Posts:2,669 Points:224,150 Joined:Jul 2011
|
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2012 5:30:49 AM
I'm for the pipeline!
|